top of page

Beginning Women Farmers in Texas

“Thank you so much for your HMI program! I will never be the same. My heart has found “my place”. These tools have totally enhanced my life and my small farm to be sustainable. Can hardly wait to see what happens on this adventure.”
–Program Participant

Beginning Women Farmers in Texas

The Beginning Women Farmer Training Program in Texas began in August 2012 when funding from the USDA/NIFA Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program (Grant #2012-49400-1963)was awarded to HMI to train 360 beginning women farmers over the next 3 years in 7 states. 30 women were accepted into the Texas program for the 2012-2013 program year and 28 completed the program successfully. The State Coordinator was Peggy Cole and the instructor was Peggy Sechrist. Program mentors were Peggy Maddox, Kathy Harris, Betsy Ross, and Laurie Bostic. At the end of each of the 10 sessions (6-8 hours in length and held over 5 two-day periods) participants filled out evaluations to measure knowledge and attitude change, intended behavior change, and actual change. There was a final program evaluation that also measured these changes with the whole program in mind and the changes and results of those changes that took place over a seven-month period.


The data below demonstrates that a high level of knowledge and attitude change occurred and that the women completed or modified numerous farm plans (actual behavior change) which resulted in many benefits. Most participants experienced increased confidence in key farm/ranch management practices (90-97% participants). Participant behavior change was mostly in the 90-100% range where there was sufficient time for developing plans or taking action during the program. Additional survey and evaluations will be done in a year to determine continued behavior change and additional benefits that result from that change.

In 8 out of the 10 sessions 100% of the participants noted knowledge change. That knowledge change varied depending on content of sessions, but key content area change was in the 85-157% range. Interestingly, large levels of knowledge change did not always correlate to high levels of satisfaction with a given session (although overall satisfaction with sessions were 86% or higher).


Demographics

Of the 30 participants the following demographics were:Average 4.8 years of farming (range: 1 – 10 years with only 2 having one or less years of experience)42,734 acres under production (range: 1 – 34,000 acres with a median of 80 acres)Race: 3% Hispanic, 97% Anglo Age: 60% over 50, 40% under 50 Farming Experience: 100% less than 10 years experience Total customers of all participants: 1,13527 were livestock producers, 9 were small scale vegetable/fruit producers, and 3 were large crop production (some did two different types of operation)

These demographics suggest that this program (over a 3-year period in 7 states) will result in 14,400 more customers having access to a sustainable food system as these women increase their knowledge, continue to plan more effectively and implement those plans so that they improve their ability to manage all resources (human, financial, and natural).


Key Programmatic Outcomes

The knowledge gained, the confidence built, and the intentions to implement actions show that the sessions were very effective in educating the participants. Likewise, the high numbers of expressed satisfaction (ranging from 86 – 97% for all sessions) indicate that the participants felt the program was successful. See the following tables for key areas of knowledge, confidence, intended behavior change, actual behavior change, and subsequent results of that behavior change due to this program.

 




Top Areas of Increased Farmer/Rancher Confidence Due to Program

Topic Area

% of Participants

Human Resource Management

 

Managing time on the farm

97%

Making complex decisions on the farm

93%

Developing and writing whole farm goals

91%

Implementing strategic systems and projects

91%

Providing leadership on the farm

86%

Financial Resource Management

 

Identifying logjams and adverse factors

97%

Developing a business plan

96%

Prioritizing and cutting farm expenses to guide re-investment

93%

Getting profit from the farm

93%

Identifying cash flow issues on farm

93%

Determining weak link in farm enterprises

90%

Assessing the competition

88%

Developing a marketing plan that meets your farm goals

88%

Determining viable profitable enterprises

87%

Monitoring financial plan

83%

Natural Resource Management

 

Assessing recovery periods in grazing systems

97%

Determining residency periods in grazing systems

96%

Monitoring farm eco-system health

96%

Ability to prioritize land infrastructure improvements

96%

Ability to incorporate natural resource issues into land planning

96%

Improving soil eco-system health on the farm

93%

 




Top Areas of Actual Behavior Change Due to Program

Plans Created/Action Taken

% of Participants

Holistic Goal/Whole Farm Plan

100%

Forge Relationships that Positively Impact Farmer

100%

Holistic Decision Making

96%

Financial Plan

93%

Business Plan

90%

Land Plan

90%

Grazing Plan (of those raising livestock)

84%

Biological Monitoring

80%

 




Top Areas Outcomes Achieved Due to Program

Outcome Areas

% of Participants

Human Resource Management

 

Improved ability to make complex decisions

100%

More efficient use of resources

97%

Improved decision-making

97%

Better ability to determine resources available for management

97%

Clearer sense of what farm is managing towards

97%

Higher quality of life

90%

Better communication

93%

Improved time management

93%

Improved communications on the farm

87%

Financial Resource Management

 

Increased ability to determine profit

100%

New record keeping systems

90%

Improved ability to incorporate social, environmental, and financial information into land plan

90%

Increased understanding of your farm finances

87%

Ability to prioritize expenses

87%

Improved ability to prioritize land/infrastructure investments

87%

 




Knowledge Change Summary

Sessions

% of Participants Experiencing Knowledge Change

On Farm Decision Making/Time Management

100%

Financial Planning

100%

Enterprise Analysis/Cash Flow

100%

Marketing Planning

100%

Business Planning

100%

Leadership/Communication

100%

Land Planning

100%

Grazing Planning

100%

Whole Farm Goal

97%

Soil Fertility/Biological Monitoring

89%

 




Top Knowledge Change Areas

Knowledge Areas

Based on self-assessed knowledge increase

Human Resource Management

 

Ability to Implement Systems and Projects to Move Towards Whole Farm Goal

91%

Assess How Time is Spent on Farm

85%

Financial Resource Management

 

Design Strategies to Build Resilient, Diversified Farms

116%

How to Incorporate Social/Legal/Contractual into Land Planning

111%

Ability to Develop a Business Plan for Farm

111%

Prioritize Land and Infrastructure Development/Investments

110%

Monitoring Your Financial Plan

105%

Ability to Use Financial Plan to Determine Viable Markets for Farm

105%

Knowledge of Resources for Developing Strategic Plan for Farm

100%

Assess Management Considerations to Guide Land Planning

95%

How to Incorporate Natural Resource Issues into Land Planning

95%

Getting Profit You Need from Your Farm

95%

Prioritizing and Cutting Farm Expenses to Guide Reinvestment

95%

Skills in Developing Whole Farm Financial Plan

91%

Assessing Farm Cash Flow

91%

Ability to Use Whole Farm Goal to Guide Business Strategic Plan

87%

Identifying Logjams and Adverse Factors on Farm

86%

Using Whole Farm Goal and Financial Plan to Develop Marketing Plan

82%

Attitudes Towards Value of Having a Business Plan to Guide Farm

80%

Profitably Price Products and Services

77%

Natural Resource Management

 

How to Determine Grazing Periods

157%

How to Assess Recovery Periods

157%

How to Determine the Number of Paddocks

154%

How to Determine Number of Animals Your Pasture Can Support

100%

How to Assess Quantity of Forage in Pasture

95%

How to Improve Land Health with Livestock

91%

Value of Grazing Planning

90%

Indicators of a Healthy Farm Eco-System

83%



Participant Satisfaction

Session

% of Participants Rating Class as Good or Excellent


Leadership/Communication

97%


Business Planning

96%


Land Planning

96%


Enterprise Analysis/Cash Flow

93%


Biological Monitoring

93%


Whole Farm Goal

91%


Grazing Planning

89%


Marketing

88%


Financial Planning

87%


Decision Testing/Time Management

86%


 

Participant Quotes

“There has been a constant & rich exchange of information: books, enterprises. I now have methods & materials to improve my land that match my holistic goal where before I was stuck.”[This program has] “given me new ideas & resources to improve my own farm systems, given me confidence in my own abilities & encouragement that I, too, can farm (ranch).”[I have a] “network of resources developed within BWFRTX group and new business relationships developed from doing program exercises.”[The] “women (mentors & trainees) have helped me w/ranch decisions, made on-site visits to consult about pasture & orchard management and offered resources I have used to increase pasture productivity.”“Creating this community of farmers should be continued/funded given we are improving farm efficiencies and can provide leadership to new area farmers.”

Conclusions


Based on the data and response from participants, HMI’s ability to take this program from the Northeast U.S. to Texas was successful due to program structure and curriculum, support and connection between Northeast State Coordinators and Texas State Coordinator, and current capacity of Holistic Management practitioners/mentors and instructors. To build a sustainable program will require the training of additional mentor/educator resource which will take place in years two and three of this grant program.

bottom of page